Design Considerations for ESD Protection
AP-209
Application Note
215 Topaz Street, Milpitas, California 95035 Tel: (408) 263-3214 Fax: (408) 263-7846 www.calmicro.com
10/98 1
C0140398A
© 1998 California Micro Devices Corp. All rights reserved.
P/Active and PAC are trademarks of California Micro Devices.
1 California Micro Devices manufactures products covered by one or more of U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,355,014, 5,370,766, and 5,514,612, 5,706,163, and other pending applications.
Introduction
As electronic appliances become more pervasive, and with
the continuing trend to scale transistor sizes down to pack
more performance and functions into a silicon die,
Electrostatic Discharge (ESD) protection is becoming a
prominent system requirement. California Micro Devices
manufactures a family of integrated ESD Protection Diode
Arrays which are designed to meet the most stringent ESD
requirements in existence today - the IEC-1000-4-2
International Standard for ESD testing. This application
note addresses issues that designers should be aware of to
derive maximum benefit from employing such ESD
Protection Diode Arrays.
The IEC-1000-4-2 ESD Model
The IEC-1000-4-2 ESD model has evolved into the most
accepted method of characterizing and testing the ability
of electronic equipment to withstand ESD in a controlled
environment. In this standard, the ESD pulse is simulated
by charging a 150pF capacitor to a high voltage and
discharging it through a 330 Ohm resistor into the
equipment under test. The discharge can be conducted
directly through electrical contact with the test point (contact
discharge), or indirectly across an air gap (air discharge).
Contact discharge is the preferred test method, since air
discharges tend to be unpredictable and are, therefore, not
repeatable. The standard also specifies four levels of test
severity as outlined in Table 1. Note that there is no implied
equivalence between contact and air discharge testing at
each level.
ESD Protection Schemes
There are a variety of ways to protect electronic systems
from damage by ESD. They range from mechanically
deflecting the ESD pulse from entering the system by
judicious placement of ground shields around user accessible
points, to providing alternate shunt paths to dissipate the ESD
energy so that it does not damage sensitive internal components.
For a detailed discussion on ESD and the various protection
schemes that are commonly used, refer to the California Micro
Devices Application Note AP-208, Electro-static Discharge
Protection of High Performance Integrated Circuits.
California Micro Devices offers a family of ESD protection diode
arrays designed to withstand level-4 contact discharge as defined
in the IEC-1000-4-2 standard, as shown in Table 2.
Each channel of these arrays utilizes a pair of diodes as the
basic ESD protection mechanism (see Figure 1). In
operation, VP is generally connected to the system power
supply, and VN to ground. The Channel I/O pin is connected
to the device or I/O line being protected. When a positive
(with respect to ground) ESD pulse strikes the Channel I/O
pin, diode D1 conducts and steers the ESD current pulse
into the system supply line. Thus the voltage at the Channel
I/O pin is clamped at the power supply voltage plus the
forward voltage of D1. Similarly, for a negative ESD strike,
D2 conducts and clamps the voltage at the Channel I/O pin
at one forward voltage of D2 below ground. Thus the device
or I/O line being protected will see a substantially lower
voltage than the applied ESD peak voltage.
Table 1: IEC-1000-4-2 Test Levels
leveL
tcatnoC
tseTegrahcsiD
)VK(egatloV
egrahcsiDriA
tseT
)VK(egatloV
12 2
24 4
36 8
48 51
x
)1
laicepSlaicepS
)1ebotsahlevelehT.levelneponasi"x"
tnempiuqedetacidedehtnideificeps
esohtnahtsegatlovrehgihfI.noitacificeps
yamtnempiuqetsetlaiceps,deificepseranwohs
.dedeeneb
traP
rebmuN
rebmuN
fo
slennahC
gnidaoLlacipyT
V5.2@ecnaticapaC
400NDCAP2 Fp5.3
600NDCAP6 Fp0.3
200NDCAP71Fp5.7
700NDCAP 81Fp5.7
Table 2: ESD Protection Diode Arrays
D1
V
V
P
N
Channel I/O
pin
D2
Figure 1: Schematic of one ESD Protection Channel
Using ESD Protection Diode Arrays
CALIFORNIA MICRO DEVICES
CALIFORNIA MICRO DEVICES
10/98
2
Design Considerations for ESD Protection
Using ESD Protection Diode Arreys
215 Topaz Street, Milpitas, California 95035 Tel: (408) 263-3214 Fax: (408) 263-7846 www.calmicro.com
D1
V
L
V
I
V
GND
V
P
1
X
ESD
CC
N
ESD
Entry
Point
Device
Being
Protected
D2
A major advantage of this ESD protection circuit is the low
loading capacitance that can be achieved for a given level of
protection relative to other schemes using Zener or breakdown
diodes. Since the forward voltage drops of D1 and D2 are
much lower than the breakdown voltage of Zener or other
breakdown diodes, the power dissipation of D1 and D2 when
subjected to an ESD strike is much lower. Hence D1 and D2
can be much smaller physically, resulting in significantly lower
junction capacitance. For example, the PAC DN006 has a typical
channel loading capacitance of just 3pF. It is not uncommon
for Zener or breakdown protection devices to have loading
capacitance of 100 pF or more. Capacitive loading is a serious
problem in high speed applications such as video ports, as it
slows down signal edges and distorts the signal.
Characteristics of the
IEC-1000-4-2 ESD Pulse
The IEC-1000-4-2 standard ESD model specifies an ESD current
pulse that has an extremely fast rise time (between 700pS and
1 nS), as shown in Figure 2. Furthermore, any ESD generator
compliant with this standard must be calibrated to the waveform
parameters shown in Table 3. This fast rise time dictates that
care must be exercised in the design and layout of protection
circuits. This application note will explain these issues and
establish design guidelines to ensure maximum benefit from
the use of these ESD Protection Diode Arrays.
Effects of Parasitic inductance
in the ESD Current Path
To begin with, let us examine the effect of parasitic inductances
in the ESD current path. If not properly controlled, these
parasitic inductances can add substantially to the clamp voltage
of the ESD protection diodes. Figure 3 illustrates the effect of
parasitic inductance (L1) in the positive supply return when a
positive (with respect to GND) ESD pulse is applied. In this
case, diode D1 conducts and steers the ESD current pulse
(IESD) into the VCC line. The clamp voltage (VX) seen by the
device being protected is given by:
(1) VX = VF1 + L1 x dlESD/dt + VCC
where VF1 is the forward voltage drop of the diode D1, and
assuming that VCC is a perfect power supply with zero output
impedance.
As explained in a previous section, a level-4 contact discharge
ESD pulse, compliant with the IEC-100-4-2 ESD model,
typically results in a current pulse that rises from zero to a
peak amplitude of 30A in 1 nS. Thus dIESD/dt can be
approximated by 30 x 10-9. Assuming that L1 is 10 nH for
example, it will contribute 300 V to VX. The forward drop of
the diode D1 is typically well under 30V under the same peak
current for ESD Protection Arrays such as the PAC DN006. So
Figure 2: IEC-1000-4-2 Compliant ESD
Current Pulse Waveform
Table 3: IEC-1000-4-2 ESD Waveform Parameters
Figure 3: Effect of parasitic inductance in the
VCC line on ESD clamp voltage.
Level Test Voltage
leveL egatloVtseT
VK
tnerruckaeptsriF
egrahcsidfo
)%01±(
A
emitesiR t
r
Sn
tnerruC
)%03±(
Sn03ta
A
tnerruC
)%03±(
Sn06ta
A
12 5.71ot7.042
24 511ot7.084
36 5.221ot7.0216
48031ot7.0618
CALIFORNIA MICRO DEVICES
10/98 3
215 Topaz Street, Milpitas, California 95035 Tel: (408) 263-3214 Fax: (408) 263-7846 www.calmicro.com
Design Considerations for ESD Protection
Using ESD Protection Diode Arreys
VX is dominated by the contribution of L1.
A similar situation occurs for parasitic inductance in the ground
return path. In this case, the clamping voltage for negative
ESD pulses is increased due to the presence of inductance in
the ground path.
These parasitic inductances can be minimized by following a
few simple rules in the layout of the printed circuit board:
Use VCC and ground planes for power and ground
distribution whenever possible.
Keep the printed circuit traces from the VP and VN
pins of the ESD Protection Diode Array to the VCC
and Ground planes short and wide. Ideally,
connect the VP and VN pins directly through
multiple vias to the VCC and Ground planes.
Effect of Output Impedance
of the Power Supply
From Equation (1) above, it can be seen that VCC also adds
directly to the positive clamp voltage VX. It is easy to make
the assumption that power supplies will always keep the output
voltage constant regardless of loading conditions. While this
is a reasonable assumption for low frequency load variations
that are within the load regulation range of the power supply,
it is not the case when the power supply is being forced to
absorb a level-4 ESD current pulse. Under this condition, the
power supply can exhibit an output impedance much higher
than when it is operating under normal operating conditions.
For each Ohm of output impedance, VCC will be increased by
a peak voltage of 30V. Thus the peak value of VX will be
increased by the same amount.
A simple, yet effective, solution to this is to connect a high
frequency bypass capacitor between the VP pin and the ground
plane, with minimal PCB trace lengths to minimize inductance.
It is imperative that this bypass capacitor has low internal
series inductance. For this reason, electrolytic capacitors should
be avoided. In general, a ceramic chip capacitor in the range
of 0.1 uF to 0.2 uF should be adequate. The inclusion of the
bypass capacitor also helps in alleviating the effect of parasitic
inductance in the VCC return path. A Zener diode with a
breakdown voltage slightly above the maximum value of VCC
can also be connected in parallel with the bypass capacitor to
mitigate the effects of parasitic series inductance inherent in
the capacitor.
The example PCB layout shown in Figure 4 shows how parasitic
inductances in the VCC and ground paths can be minimized
while incorporating the bypass capacitor as well. In this
example, the PAC DN006 is used as the Protection Diode Array.
Maximizing Effectiveness
of ESD protection Diodes
Most CMOS VLSI integrated circuits have built-in ESD
protection diode networks that are similar to those used in
California Micro Devices ESD Protection Diode Arrays.
However, they are usually designed to withstand much lower
ESD voltages. In addition, when these devices are powered
up, they are prone to ESD-induced latch-up. This is a
phenomenon whereby the parasitic SCR inherent in all bulk
CMOS processes is triggered by excessive current flowing
through these built-in ESD protection diodes. This is usually a
destructive event. Hence it is important to minimize the current
flowing through these internal diodes under an ESD strike. By
employing external ESD protection devices such as the ESD
Protection Diode Array, the ESD current is diverted through
the external protection diodes, reducing the current that flows
through the internal diodes. Maximum benefit can be derived
by forcing most, if not all, of the ESD current to flow through
the external diode. This can be achieved by inserting a series
resistor between the external diode network and the device
being protected as shown in Figure 5.
The choice of value of the series resistor is dependent on the
application. In general, when the protected pin is a logic input
pin, the value of this resistor can be quite high without
affecting the normal operation of the protected device. This is
due to the fact that CMOS logic inputs typically have input
resistance in the Mega-Ohms range. Here, the only concern
would be the degradation in input rise and fall times resulting
Figure 4: PCB layout example using the PAC DN006.
CALIFORNIA MICRO DEVICES
10/98
4
Design Considerations for ESD Protection
Using ESD Protection Diode Arreys
215 Topaz Street, Milpitas, California 95035 Tel: (408) 263-3214 Fax: (408) 263-7846 www.calmicro.com
from the RC filter formed by the series resistor and the input
capacitance of the pin. For output or I/O pins, the value of
the series resistor should generally be much lower than the
output resistance of the output drivers. Otherwise degradation
in output levels may occur.
Physical Placement of Protection
Diode Array and Protected Component
in Printed Circuit Board
The location of the ESD Protection Diode Array in a PCB relative
to the component to be protected is crucial to realizing good
ESD protection. In general, it is preferable to place the ESD
Protection Diode Array close to the point of entry of any
expected ESD. This ensures that the ESD energy is absorbed
and dissipated safely as quickly as possible on entry to minimize
disturbance to the rest of the system.
The placement of the component to be protected is also critical.
This is, again, due to the effect of the parasitic PCB trace
inductance on the ESD current pulse with its fast rise time.
Consider the two PCB layout examples in Figure 5. In case
(a), the component to be protected is placed upstream from
the Protection Diode Array and connected to it with a long
PCB trace which has an effective inductance of LS. In this
case, LS would resist the flow of ESD current into the Protection
Diode Array, forcing most of the ESD current to flow into the
protected component, thus defeating the purpose of the
Protection Diode Array. Simply exchanging the placement of
Figure 5: Using series resistor to force ESD
current through external protection diode.
Conclusion
Compliance to the IEC-1000-4-2 ESD standard is fast becoming
a system requirement, even in consumer electronics. California
Micro Devices provides a family of easy to use ESD Protection
Diode Arrays to help designers achieve the highest level of
ESD protection (level 4) specified in that standard. This family
ranges from a two-channel array to a highly integrated 18-
channel array, all offering very low loading capacitance for
high speed signal applications.
Due to the very fast rise time inherent in the ESD current pulse,
designers must be aware of the significance of parasitic
inductances in the ESD current path and non-ideal behavior of
circuit elements, and deal with them in the design in order to
achieve maximum benefits from deploying any ESD protection
devices, including California Micro Devices family of ESD
Protection Diode Arrays. This Application Note has explored
these issues and recommended guidelines to help the system
designers achieve ESD tolerant systems.
S
S
PCB trace with equivalent
inductance L
PCB trace with equivalent
inductance L
Protected
Component
From ESD
entry point
From ESD
entry point
Protected
Component
ESD Protection
Array
ESD Protection
Array
Figure 6: Placement of ESD Protection Array
and component to be protected.
Case (a) - Poor PCB layout
Case (b) - Good PCB layout
these two devices as in case (b) will result in much improved
ESD tolerance for the system. The protected component is
now connected downstream from the Protection Diode
Array, where LS acts to divert ESD current away from the
protected component and into the Protection Diode Array
where it can be dissipated safely.